Observability as a Service: Why It’s Crucial for DevOps
Tool sprawl, audit load and budget volatility are now common aspects of operating modern infrastructure. As environments stretch across multiple clouds and on-premises systems, achieving consistent visibility becomes harder — especially when each team works with different tools and telemetry models. Observability as a service (OaaS) offers a salient alternative.
A managed approach to observability provides comprehensive, correlated insights through a unified platform while preserving local control over routing, ingest and operating costs. With the right partner, teams can achieve actionable visibility across hybrid estates without surrendering ownership or increasing overhead.
What is observability as a service?
Observability as a service delivers metrics, events, logs and traces (MELT) alongside topology context through a managed platform. Unlike traditional monitoring tools, an observability platform proactively correlates signals across your infrastructure. These platforms map dependencies between services, identify which teams own specific components and track configuration changes. In mixed environments, a hybrid cloud observability solution unifies MELT data and topology across all of your sites and clouds under a single ownership model.
When observability is offered as a managed service, it means that a vendor handles the operational complexity of data collection, storage and infrastructure scaling. OaaS promises continuous platform updates, integrated security features and expert support, helping you keep pace with new technologies. Built-in integrations connect to your existing tools. Scalable architectures handle traffic spikes without manual intervention. Together, these capabilities help to lighten the burden of maintaining infrastructure, enabling teams to refocus on operational and business priorities.
Managed platforms that rely on single agent deployment can be up and running in minutes. Despite the rapid activation, your control over your ecosystem should go unchanged. With OaaS, you still maintain authority over critical operational surfaces — policy definitions that determine monitoring scope, routing rules that direct alerts to service owners, data lifecycle controls for ingest rates and retention and compliance features that generate audit-ready evidence.
Observability in DevOps
In DevOps environments, both speed and context matter. When issues arise, teams need immediate answers — what broke, who owns it and how to fix it. Monitoring tells you that CPU usage exceeded 80%. By contrast, observability shows you that the spike followed a deployment, affects your payment service and previously occurred when cache configurations were incorrect.
Observability platforms help with linking technical signals, team-specific responsibilities and real-world actions. When a platform surfaces relevant context with every alert, teams can act more quickly and confidently. Each signal is accompanied by information about the affected service, any recent deployments or configuration changes, the responsible owner according to service registries, and steps that have resolved similar incidents in the past. This tailored context shortens the path from detection to resolution.
Because of these capabilities, observability plays a key role in DevOps feedback loops. Continuous improvement depends on tracking larger observability trends and understanding your own system behavior across time.
By capturing performance data and change history, observability platforms give you important details that drive refinement. Teams can then analyze long-term trends more effectively and uncover greater optimization opportunities. They can review incident timelines to prevent repeat failures, and they can evaluate deployment outcomes to confirm intended results. Each effort feeds institutional learning and sharpens future responses.
Managed observability vs. self-hosted platforms
Deciding between managed and self-hosted observability requires careful evaluation of organizational priorities. Each approach offers distinct advantages, which may or may not align with your organization’s operational philosophies and resource constraints.
Managed platforms excel at rapid deployment and operational simplicity. They provide one governed place to view infrastructure health. Rather than adding another dashboard to your collection, these platforms help you consolidate or retire redundant monitoring tools. Their built-in compliance features, automated scaling and vendor-managed updates directly reduce operational overhead. And even when partnering with a managed services provider, organizations maintain strategic control.
In addition, there are contemporary managed platforms that help you avoid long-term vendor dependence. Many such platforms support open ingestion protocols that accept data from any source. Portable data paths ensure you can export your telemetry when needed. In choosing a service model for your business, you do not need to choose lock-in.
Self-hosted solutions offer maximum customization and complete infrastructure ownership. Teams with specialized requirements or existing monitoring investments may prefer this model. Self-hosting demands significant resources for platform operations, capacity planning, upgrade management and integration development — which may not be sustainable for many enterprises.
When evaluating options, consider your team’s core mission. If your goal is delivering business value through applications and services, managed platforms free you to focus on that work. Partners like SUSE can help you embrace this model without the need for rip-and-replace approaches. By supporting open standards and gradual migration paths, modern OaaS platforms respect both your existing investments and future flexibility.
The key components of an observability platform
Effective observability depends on collecting and correlating multiple data types. Each type of data provides a unique perspective on system behavior. When combined with topology mapping and ownership information, these signals facilitate comprehensive understanding and rapid problem resolution.
Metrics
Metrics capture numerical measurements at regular intervals. CPU usage, memory consumption, request rates and error percentages all generate metric streams. Observability platforms aggregate these measurements to identify trends and anomalies that indicate developing issues. They also help establish baselines for normal performance, which are essential for detecting subtle regressions.
Events
Events mark significant occurrences in your infrastructure. Deployments, configuration updates, auto-scaling triggers and system errors all create events. By aligning events with performance changes, teams quickly identify root causes and understand system evolution. Events also provide valuable audit markers that frame each operational context.
Logs
Logs record detailed system activity and application behavior. Error messages, transaction records and debug output provide forensic detail. Within observability platforms, logs offer the granular evidence needed to understand exactly what occurred during an incident — especially when diagnosing edge cases or rare failures.
Traces
Traces track individual requests through distributed systems. They reveal how user actions flow across services, exposing bottlenecks and failures. For microservices architectures, traces provide the end-to-end visibility essential for performance optimization. They also help confirm whether service-level agreements are being met under real-world traffic conditions.
How observability as a service drives business value
Observability as a service has the potential to transform technical capabilities into measurable business outcomes. Key areas of value include:
MTTR
Faster detection and guided resolution directly reduce mean time to resolution. With a single agent, teams gain visibility in minutes. The platform correlates signals across environments to identify issues earlier than threshold-based monitoring. It then suggests remediation steps based on similar past incidents. As a result, many organizations significantly reduce MTTR in the first few months of adoption
Pages per engineer
Precise alert routing helps reduce engineer fatigue. Instead of broadcasting every issue to entire teams, the platform sends alerts directly to the service owners responsible for resolving them. This targeted approach cuts irrelevant pages, supports faster response and improves accountability. In addition, engineers experience fewer disruptions outside working hours.
Operating expense
Managed observability turns variable costs into predictable operating expenses. Real-time dashboards show ingestion rates and their associated costs. Teams apply sampling policies to control data volume, while use retention tiers balance storage needs. By allocating expenses at the service level, organizations can pinpoint optimization opportunities and manage budgets with greater accuracy. This predictability makes such controls core to achieving cloud observability at scale.
Auditability
Built-in compliance features simplify audit preparation. Role-based access controls restrict visibility by user and role. Every access generates a log showing who viewed what and when, while configuration changes create permanent change records. Where available, evidence packs can be generated when auditors arrive — no manual collection or backtracking required.
Portability
Platform flexibility protects long-term investments. By supporting open standards like OpenTelemetry, modern observability platforms avoid vendor lock-in. Organizations retain ownership of their telemetry data and maintain the ability to export it at any time. With API-based integrations and portable architectures, observability stays aligned with evolving infrastructure strategies.
Building a resilient observability strategy with SUSE
Clear visibility across infrastructure is beneficial to any enterprise. As the available tools and regulatory requirements continue to expand, however, observability and simplicity may feel mutually exclusive.
By focusing on open standards, native policy controls and rapid value delivery, organizations can modernize their monitoring practices without adding complexity or compromising flexibility. SUSE Cloud Observability demonstrates how these principles work in practice.
SUSE’s platform delivers unified visibility across hybrid and multi-cloud environments. Built-in compliance features satisfy audit requirements from day one. Most importantly, a commitment to open standards protects your ability to evolve your infrastructure on your terms.
Ready to transform your operations with managed observability? Try SUSE Cloud Observability free for 30 days. Just log in with your AWS account, click “View purchase options” on our AWS Marketplace listing and subscribe to get started.
Observability as a Service FAQs
What are the four pillars of observability?
The four pillars of observability are metrics, events, logs and traces. Metrics measure system performance numerically. Logs capture detailed event records. Traces track requests through distributed systems. Modern observability frameworks often include events as a fourth pillar.
What are the benefits of observability as a service?
The benefits of observability as a service include reduced MTTR, lower operational overhead and more predictable costs — specifically in comparison to self-hosted observability. With managed observability, many teams see improvements in deployment, scaling and compliance.
Can OaaS meet data residency rules?
Yes, enterprise OaaS platforms can meet residency rules. These platforms enforce geographic boundaries for collection, processing and storage. With RBAC, they restrict access by location, while audit trails document compliance.
Related Articles
Oct 21st, 2024
Edge Computing Made Easy with SUSE and Simply NUC
Feb 12th, 2025