CVE-2017-3142 and CVE-2017-3143 bind: An error in TSIG authentication can permit unauthorized zone transfers.
This document (7021041) is provided subject to the disclaimer at the end of this document.
SUSE Linux Enterprise Server 12
SUSE Linux Enterprise Desktop 12
SUSE Linux Enterprise SDK 12
An attacker who can send to and receive from an authoritative DNS server may be able to circumvent TSIG authentication of AXFR requests via a carefully constructed request packet.
A server that relies solely on TSIG keys for protection with no other ACL protection could be manipulated into:
- providing an AXFR of a zone to an unauthorized recipient
- accepting bogus Notify packets
Furthermore, if the attacker has knowledge of a valid TSIG key name for the zone and service being targeted, then it may be possible to manipulate BIND into accepting an unauthorized dynamic update.
This would effectively allow the attacker to inject arbitrary malicious content into the DNS server's master zones.
An unauthorized AXFR (full zone transfer) permits an attacker to view the entire contents of a zone. Protection of zone contents is often a commercial or business requirement.
If accepted, a Notify sets the zone refresh interval to 'now'.
If there is not already a refresh cycle in progress then named will initiate one by asking for the SOA RR from its list of masters.
If there is already a refresh cycle in progress, then named will queue the new refresh request.
If there is already a queued refresh request, the new Notify will be discarded.
Bogus notifications can't be used to force a zone transfer from a malicious server, but could trigger a high rate of zone refresh cycles.
As a workaround to mitigate this problem, please change the configuration to apply the ACL restrictions as well as TSIG authentication, as are detailed in the additional information section below.
The Internet Systems Consortium has provided further information on how to harden a server's configuration in that
regard at: https://kb.isc.org/article/AA-00723/0/Using-Access-Control-Lists-ACLs-with-both-addresses-and-keys.html
(Note that this technique will not be effective against bogus Notify packets if an attacker is able to reach the target DNS server whilst using a spoofed sending address).
For more details on Bind vulnerabilities, please reference the ISC knowledge base :
This Support Knowledgebase provides a valuable tool for NetIQ/Novell/SUSE customers and parties interested in our products and solutions to acquire information, ideas and learn from one another. Materials are provided for informational, personal or non-commercial use within your organization and are presented "AS IS" WITHOUT WARRANTY OF ANY KIND.
- Document ID:7021041
- Creation Date:29-JUN-17
- Modified Date:30-JUN-17
- SUSESUSE Linux Enterprise DesktopSUSE Linux Enterprise ServerSUSE Linux Enterprise Software Development Kit